The Jews’ Nigger: Draft Of The “Obama Assassination” Article

http://www.overthrow.com/lsn/news.asp?articleID=10933

The Jews’ Nigger
Negro-Jew Communism, Genocide, and the Presidency

9/15/2008 11:26:55 PM
Discuss this story in the forum
National Socialist

Magazine Article — Comrades:

We usually do not release articles ahead of time, or on the internet at all, but I think that, by releasing this, we may attract additional investment to our project.

Our goal is to distribute 20,000 of these magazines in white working class neighborhoods of key districts in the disputed states of Pennsylvania, Ohio and Virginia, and elsewhere as possible.

The 2008 election may well hinge on a handful of white working class voters in a handful of states that could “go either way” with their electoral votes. Pennsylvania, Ohio, Virginia, Colorado and Florida lead those states, and we have the capacity to make a difference in three of them.

We must raise $10,000 by October 1st to make this happen. We will work with what we get, and we are halfway towards our minimal goal (10,000 copies / 12 pages) of $4,000, but more money is needed.

Even small donations — $20 or $30 — will help. Forego eating out for the next two weeks and donate to the ANSWP. It will make a difference.

Send all donations to:

ANSWP
PO Box 8601
Roanoke, VA 24014

Bill White, Commander
American National Socialist Workers Party

And note that this is a DRAFT. Commentary is welcome. I will have the illustrated draft pages online soon.

—–

THE JEWS’ NIGGER
Negro-Jew Communism, Genocide, and the Presidency

Barack Hussein Obama, black communist and genocidal racial extremist that he is, is not going to win the presidency. Given his radical political views and the unpalatable nature of his personality to the average American voter, one might think Obama was nominated solely that McCain, a staunch Zionist with a long history of being a performing Jewish puppet, could take office, and the radical open borders immigration, multi-culturalist and capitalist international neo-cons could find the Oval Office’s door propped even further open. But the mere attempt to place an anti-white racist and communist Negro into the presidency should have the minds of Americans spinning with the question: “Why all the hype?”

The answer is that the Jewish left, for better than a century, have been seeking to place into power a Negro terrorist regime modeled on those currently occupying Rhodesia and South Africa, and in pursuit of that, the Jew- Bolsheviks have put forward Negro martyr after Negro martyr in an effort to idolize their “Civil Rights” struggle. From the 1960s Martin Luther King to today’s Barack Obama, black communist leaders have been a staple of leftist Jewry’s personality cult. And the sadistic hope of Jews to use America’s Negroes to slaughter white working people is only matched by their fanatical desire for a martyr — a misplaced expression of their moshiach complex — that culminates in the inevitable “assassination” of their target. And with this fluke of the Jewish psyche, America has seen itself bombard with “Obama assassination” propaganda.

After all, a dead nigger never runs out of celebrity, and a dead nigger always has more character than a living one. In his mortal life, Martin Luther King was a rapist and an adulterer, a plagiarer who stole most of his speechs and a racially conscious communist who secretly confided his desire to see America’s whites enslaved or exterminated. But, dead, shot by a member of the American Nazi Party, King was able to become a larger than life figure, a suitable center to a personality cult that idolizes the Negro and elevates the Negro race to superhuman status. And with this masochistic Negro worship the Jews were able to advance their agenda of supplanting the white race as rulers of America one more step.

Similarly, little better could befall modern Jewry than the assassination of a candidate who cannot pass the test of electoral action. Obama defeated, rejected by America, is just another also-run, a nobody, a washed up celebrity that we’ll see a few years down the road indicted for stealing from the public coffers or confessing their sins in People Magazine after their release from rehab. But Obama assassinated at the pinnacle of his celebrity is the Negro “who would have won,” if only “racist white America” hadn’t shot him down at the last minute.

The arrest of several random methamphetamine addicts in Denver, Colorado — the infamous “Obama assassination” plot — highlights the Jew media’s desperation in its effort to deify Obama. Lacking any real “white supremacist” desire to kill the candidate, the Jews took a group of common criminals and attempted to elevate them to racial nemesis, highlighting the “danger” the Negro candidates faced and the “importance” of voting for him. Amusingly, this came at a time when a real assassination of a Democrat who had recently come out for Obama — Bill Gwatney — by the real follower — Tim Johnson — of a real white nationalist leader — Hal Turner — was completely ignored.

Similarly, the summer was filled with efforts by Jewish reporters, such as Eli Saslow of the Washington Post, to create “Obama assassination” conspiracies by writing fluff pieces on how hard “white supremacists” were working to defeat the Negro. While the editor of this magazine turned Saslow’s interview offer down, several other kosher or minor white activists, such as Stormfront’s Don Black or White Revolution’s Billy Roper, were happy to oblige, feeding the Obama “white supremacist” media frenzy.

The truth is that Obama is a creature of the Jews, a Jewish – communist altern- ative to the Jewish – Zionist’s candidate John McCain, and everything about his campaign and its methods underscores this point.

First is the nominaton of Joe “I Am A Zionist” Biden as Vice President. A neo-conservative in the Democratic Party, Biden is not a Jew, but he has always stood with the most extreme war-mongering elements of world Jewry. A mini-McCain, his nomination was designed to attract the Zionist lobby and placate Jewish organizations who had started to declare Obama’s Jewish advisors “anti-Semites” for their political opposition to the Republican Party.

Chief among these Jewish “anti-Semites” is Zbigniew Brzezinski, a Polish Jew who led Jimmy Carter’s international team and who played a major role in arming and organizing Osama bin Laden’s Al-Qaeda orga- nization in the late 1970s (see photo, opposite page). Brzezinski may claim to represent the Zionist Entity’s “left wing” in America, but his politics have been predictably neo-conserv- ative in practice over the decades, with him having cooperated in the neo-cons efforts to contain the Soviet Union in Afghanistan during Carter’s admin- istration, and with him endorsing and signing on the the neo-conservative war against Serbia, and endorsing the sanctions that killed over half a million children in Iraq. Clinton Secretary of State Madeleine Albright was his protege.

Similarly, Obama has drawn great support from Jewish billionaire George Soros, master of the coup, who has financed Jewish revolutions in nations such as Georgia and Ukraine that have installed neo-conserv- ative and Zionist aligned governments in those countries. While ostensibly a “liberal”, Soros has worked with figures like Republican Party nominee John McCain to bring Mossad agents, like Temur Yakobashvili and Davit Kerashvili, into direct power in former Soviet nations.

Soros also was key in supporting Obama’s political efforts in his home nation of Kenya, where he is a member of the Mulsim Luo tribe, and has intervened substantially to support that tribe’s political future. In fact, in 2007, Obama worked with George Soros to finance Islamic militias in Kenya that killed more than one thousand Kenya Christian tribesmen and left more than 300,000 homeless, after their tribal leader lost an election.

Such episodes of racially and ethnically motivated violence are typical for Obama, who has spent most of his life as part of a radical black communist movement known as “liberation theology.” This pseudo-Christian doctrine which teaches that Jesus Christ is black, the “true people” of Israel are Negroes, and that the white race is a race of “devils” who serve Satan and who must be slaughtered and enslaved, is at the heart of the well- known “Reverend Wright” scandal, though few Jewish-owned media outlets want to describe Obama’s views so bluntly. Part of the Jewish effort for “civil rights” has been the disguising of their plans for genocide through pointed ommission of poignant details from mainstream news reports. The white masses are kept deceived, ignorant of information that never appears on their television, and the Jewish-financed Negro machine marches one step closer to racial genocide.

Besides Penny Pritzker, Jewish billionaire and financier of the Obama campaign, Obama’s chief campaign advisor is David Axelrod, a Jewish media manipulator who has built Obama’s media campaign and worked to shape his image as a modern media celebrity. Ignoring substance, Axelrod had hoped Obama could win the election the way Michael Jordan wins sneaker endorsements, with sheer strength of a Jewish-carved “personality”. But more sinister than these two well known Obama Jews is Obama’s political mentor, “Weatherman” terrorist William Ayers.

The Jews method has always been to finance organizations with gentile frontmen, and then sit quietly on the board while the gentiles give the impression the group is not “Jewish”. This is true for the NAACP, which was Jewish founded and financed, true for South Africa’s African National Congress, which was also Jewish founded and financed, and true for the Weatherman Underground and the other “civil rights” terrorists groups of the late 1960s and 1970s, which were Jewish funded and financed, just as it is true for the Obama campaign today. Bill Ayers, in 1970, was the gentile face of the Jewish Weatherman organization, and today he remains a trusted shabbos goy in left-wing Jewish networks. Rewarded for his bombing of the Pentagon, American military targets and police stations, Ayers was rewarded upon his release from prison with a professorship at University of Illinois in Chicago, and with his contacts in the Jewish community, he is considered a person who can make people in Chicago politics.

Barack Obama, the Kenyan tribesman and black radical whose political cynicism and willingess to commit murder to further his tribe, and his race’s, cause, endeared him to Ayers’ terroristic heart, causing him to become a protege of the Weatherman remnant in 1999. Ayers organized support among Chicago’s radical Jewish Marxists for Obama’s first State Senate campaign in 2001 and has remained a key member of Obama’s advisory staff since.

With these links to Marxist terrorism in America, anti-white racist “churches”, and racial and religious genocide in his home country of Kenya, one has to wonder what is Obama’s real plan for America’s white working class. While Obama himself keeps his views closely guarded, a look at similar Negro revolutionaries, financed around the world by Jewish Bolsheviks, and their impact on white people is illustrative of what America would face during an Obama presidency.

While many former colonies in Africa have seen their white population drive away or slaughtered, the textbook cases of Jewish financed Negro genocide are South Africa and Rhodesia, where systematic efforts to dispossess and slaughter whites in favor of Jewish money have been conducted by Jewish- backed black dictators.

Robert Mugabe, for instance, the black dictator of Rhodesia who came to power as leader of the communist guerilla group ZANU-PF, was financed almost entirely in his early days, and in large part in his latter ones, by British Jewish billionaire Nicholas Von Hoogstraaten, who profited directly from Mugabe’s efforts to “nationalize” white farms by stealing white people’s land and slaughtering white families — men, women and children.

Similarly, Nelson Mandela and his successors in South Africa came to power as the result of Jews like Lionel Bernstein, Bob Hepple, Dennis Goldberg, Arthur Goldreich, Hazel Goldreich and James Kantor, founders of the African National Congress. Since that day, the situation in South Africa has deteroirated as the black-Jewish government has urged the country’s poor Negroes to murder, rape and rob its white residents, and whites, unable to flee, have had to isolate themselves in remote communities.

Closer to home, one only has to look at the modern American NAACP and the Jessie Jackson-Al Sharpton “civil rights” movement, which dedicates its time to defending and justifying black-on-white racial violence, as in the Jena 6 case, to see that America’s Jewish-financed black radicals have the same violent anti-white agenda as the black radicals of Southern Africa’s former colonies.

John McCain may be no solution to America’s Jewish problem, but he does not have a direct agenda of genocide against America’s white working class. He may have contempt for us, but he does not want to see the bodies of white men, women and children stacked to the sky as white cities burn and the survivors suffer. Barack Obama is a politician who has shown, in his native land, his willingness to use genocide as a political weapon, and in this land, a racial hatred for white people that is frightening, given his prominence. White people must deny him the presidency, as a radical he admires might say, “by any means necessary”.

U.S. Finds Iran Halted Its Nuclear Arms Effort in 2003

WASHINGTON, Dec. 3 — A new assessment by American intelligence agencies released Monday concludes that Iran halted its nuclear weapons program in 2003 and that the program remains frozen, contradicting a judgment two years ago that Tehran was working relentlessly toward building a nuclear bomb.

The conclusions of the new assessment are likely to reshape the final year of the Bush administration, which has made halting Iran’s nuclear program a cornerstone of its foreign policy.

The assessment, a National Intelligence Estimate that represents the consensus view of all 16 American spy agencies, states that Tehran is likely to keep its options open with respect to building a weapon, but that intelligence agencies “do not know whether it currently intends to develop nuclear weapons.”

Iran is continuing to produce enriched uranium, a program that the Tehran government has said is intended for civilian purposes. The new estimate says that the enrichment program could still provide Iran with enough raw material to produce a nuclear weapon sometime by the middle of next decade, a timetable essentially unchanged from previous estimates.

But the new report essentially disavows a judgment that the intelligence agencies issued in 2005, which concluded that Iran had an active secret arms program intended to transform the raw material into a nuclear weapon. The new estimate declares instead with “high confidence” that that the military-run program has been shut down since 2003, and it concludes that the halt was imposed by Iran “primarily in response to increasing international scrutiny and pressure.”

It was not clear what prompted the reversal. Administration officials said the new estimate reflected conclusions that the intelligence agencies had agreed on only in the past several weeks. The report’s agnosticism about Iran’s nuclear intentions represents a very different tone than had been struck by President Bush, and by Vice President Dick Cheney, who warned in a speech in October that if Iran “stays on its present course, the international community is prepared to impose serious consequences.”

The estimate does not say when intelligence agencies learned that the arms program had been halted, but officials said new information obtained from covert sources over the summer had led to a reassessment of the state of Iran’s nuclear program and a decision to delay preparation of the estimate, which had been scheduled to be delivered to Congress in the spring.

The new report came out just over five years after a 2002 intelligence estimate on Iraq concluded that it possessed chemical and biological weapons programs and was determined to restart its nuclear program. That estimate was instrumental in winning the Congressional authorization for a military invasion of Iraq, but it proved to be deeply flawed, and most of its conclusions turned out to be wrong.

Intelligence officials said the specter of the 2002 estimate on Iraq hung over their deliberations on Iran even more than it had in 2005, when the lessons from the intelligence failure on Iraq were just beginning to prompt spy agencies to adapt a more rigorous approach to their findings.

The 2007 report on Iran had been requested by members of Congress, underscoring that any conclusions could affect American policy toward Iran at a delicate time. The new estimate brought American assessments more in line with the judgments of international arms inspectors.

Last month, Mohamed ElBaradei, director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, reported that Iran was operating 3,000 uranium-enriching centrifuges capable of producing fissile material for nuclear weapons, but he said inspectors had been unable to determine whether the Iranian program sought only to generate electricity or to also to build weapons.

Senator Harry Reid, Democrat of Nevada and the Senate majority leader, portrayed the assessment as “directly challenging some of this administration’s alarming rhetoric about the threat posed by Iran” and called for enhanced diplomatic efforts toward Tehran. Democratic presidential candidates mostly echoed Senator Reid, but also emphasized that Iran’s long-term ambitions were still a great concern to the United States.

In interviews on Monday, some administration officials expressed skepticism about the conclusions reached in the new report, saying they doubted that American intelligence agencies had a firm grasp of the Iranian government’s intentions.

The administration officials also said the intelligence findings would not lessen the White House’s concern about the prospect of a nuclear-armed Iran. The fact that Iran continues to refine its abilities to enrich uranium, they said, means that any decision in the future to restart a nuclear weapons program could lead Iran to a bomb in relatively short order. While the new report does not contrast sharply with earlier assessments about Iran’s capabilities, it does make new judgments about the intentions of the government in Tehran.

Rather than portraying Iran as a rogue, irrational country determined to join the club of nations that possess a nuclear bomb, the estimate says Iran’s “decisions are guided by a cost-benefit approach rather than a rush to a weapon irrespective of the political, economic and military costs.”

The administration called new attention to the threat posed by Iran this year when Mr. Bush suggested in October that a nuclear-armed Iran could lead to “World War III.” Mr. Cheney also said that month that as Iran continued to enrich uranium, “the end of that process will be the development of nuclear weapons.”

Yet even as Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney were making those statements, analysts at the Central Intelligence Agency were well under way toward revising the earlier assessment about Iran’s nuclear arms program. Administration officials said the White House had known at the time that the conclusions about Iran were under review but had not been informed until more recently that intelligence agencies had reversed their 2005 conclusion.

In September, officials said, Gen. Michael V. Hayden, the C.I.A. director, and his deputy, Stephen R. Kappes, met with Iran analysts to take a hard look at past conclusions about Iran’s nuclear program in light of new information obtained since 2005.

“We felt that we needed to scrub all the assessments and sources to make sure we weren’t misleading ourselves,” said one senior intelligence official, speaking on condition of anonymity.

The estimate concludes that if Iran were to restart its arms program, it would still be at least two years before Tehran would have enough highly enriched uranium to produce a nuclear bomb. But it says it is still “very unlikely” Iran could produce enough of the material by then.

Instead, the report released on Monday concludes that it is more likely that Iran could have a bomb by the early part to the middle of the next decade. The report states that the State Department’s Bureau of Intelligence and Research judges that Iran is unlikely to achieve this goal before 2013, “because of foreseeable technical and programmatic problems.”

The estimate concludes that it would be difficult to persuade Iran’s leaders to abandon all efforts to get nuclear weapons, given the importance of getting the bomb to Iran’s strategic goals in the Middle East.

Intelligence officials presented the outlines of the intelligence estimate two weeks ago to several cabinet members, along with Mr. Cheney. During the meeting, officials said, policy makers challenged and debated the conclusions reached by the intelligence agencies. The final draft of the estimate was presented to Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney last Wednesday.

Officials said they now planned to give extensive briefings to American allies like Israel, Britain and France. Israel intelligence officials for years have put forward more urgent warnings about Iran’s nuclear abilities than their American counterparts, positing that Iran could get a nuclear bomb this decade.

Intelligence officials had said just weeks ago they were ending the practice of declassifying parts of intelligence estimates, citing concerns that analysts might alter their judgments if they knew the reports would be widely publicized.

But in a statement on Monday, Donald M. Kerr, the principal deputy director of national intelligence, said that since the new estimate was at odds with the 2005 assessment — and thus at odds with public statements by top officials about Iran — “we felt it was important to release this information to ensure that an accurate presentation is available.”